


Pretty cool, as usual...
Well, look no further than this article from Coming Soon:
Big news dropping today, via Box Office Mojo:In one of the most anticipated announcements in recent memory, Warner Bros. officially set a date this morning for the follow-up to The Dark Knight. Tentatively known as Batman 3, the movie will debut July 20, 2012 in conventional and IMAX theaters, almost exactly four years after The Dark Knight opened to record-breaking numbers.
At this time, there are no details available regarding the plot or the cast, though it is assumed that Christian Bale at least will be reprising his role as Bruce Wayne/Batman. Warner Bros. was also unable to confirm whether or not Batman Begins and Dark Knight writer-director Christopher Nolan would be taking on those responsibilities again for part three.
Thanks to a wealth of factors including the perceived quality of Batman Begins, the promise of The Joker as the villain, the publicity surrounding star Heath Ledger's performance and untimely death and the movie's overwhelmingly positive reviews, The Dark Knight debuted to an astounding $158.4 million, setting an opening weekend record that has yet to be topped. By the end of its run, The Dark Knight banked $533.4 million, making it only the second movie ever to cross the $500 million mark at the time (since then, Avatar has also reached this milestone). Worldwide, The Dark Knight accumulated just over $1 billion, putting it in the top five all-time.
The Spider-Man reboot, set to debut on July 3, 2012, is the only other release currently scheduled for July 2012. Other high-profile movies scheduled for Summer 2012 are The Avengers (May 4), Madagascar 3 (May 18), Battleship (May 25), Disney/Pixar's Brave (June 15) and the Untitled Star Trek Sequel (June 29).
-The summer of 2012 could be shaping up to be a big one...thoughts?From: Peter Bart
I hope you like the heat, Chris, because you've managed to put yourself in the pressure cooker.
When your new film "Inception" opens a month from now, attention will be riveted on it because of the secrecy surrounding its plot, plus its cost ($160 million), plus its cast (Leonardo DiCaprio is up to weird stuff yet again) plus, finally, because its entire presentation seems like a throwback to the '70s.
I suppose, Chris, you wanted it that way from the start. In your mind the screenplay was so unique that you instructed executives at Warner Bros. to trek to your office to read it. No copies could be circulated and cast members could read only their scenes, not those of other actors.
All this reminds me of the quirky ways of Stanley Kubrick or Richard Brooks a generation ago, and so does the mysterioso plot. Depending on who you talk to, "Inception" is either an "existential heist" film or a "surreal thriller." Geoff Boucher of the Los Angeles Times writes that "there's a temptation to frame the film as a comment on the 'otherness' of modern life." OK, that clears it up.
But bear in mind, Chris, that your exercise in surrealism will open on a movie landscape cluttered with superheroes, homoerotic vampires, homicidal aliens and, of course, talking dogs and chipmunks. And, all the while, cinephiles will be measuring it against "The Dark Knight," which has become the "Avatar" of Batman movies.
To be sure, after "The Dark Knight," you've earned the right to some quirkitude. But bear in mind, Chris, that the era of the auteur director is a thing of the past. Today the franchise itself is the star. Filmmakers have become hired hands who are skilled at pitching a 3D tent atop a swaying tentpole.
It's difficult to remember the atmosphere of the '70s, when young filmmakers suddenly demanded final cut and even ownership of the copyright. It was 40 years ago when Francis Coppola, Peter Bogdanovich and Billy Friedkin set up the Directors Company, proudly flying the flag of creative autonomy. (Within two years the flag came down.)
Studios these days are radically cutting back on their "final cut" deals. Agents no longer fall on their swords to negotiate "a film by" credits. A couple of years ago Sharon Waxman wrote a book called "Rebels on the Back Lot: Six Maverick Directors and How They Conquered the Hollywood Studio System." The trouble was that, for most of the directors (David O. Russell, P.T. Anderson, Spike Jonze, etc) things didn't turn out that way.
Which brings us back to "Inception." It's apparently a serious movie with serious ambitions. But today's filmgoers will be measuring it against the work of Jim Cameron or Michael Bay, not that of Kubrick. More relevant, they'll likely be hoping it's more like "Dark Knight" than your earlier surreal film, "Memento."
You may have hidden the screenplay, Chris, but you've got to lay it all out on the line come July, because that's when Warner Bros. lifts the lid off the pressure cooker. The studio insists it's proud of the picture -- but you and I know they would have loved the inclusion of at least one homoerotic vampire or homicidal alien.
And while he doesn't give up much info in his interview (you can find the full interview on any number of sites, including the following snippets on The Hollywood Reporter), there are some nice tidbits, which I'll show now:Nolan confirms he is acting as "godfather" for the Superman movie -- I can tell you that at the end of the day, he is acting as a producer and will likely be credited that way -- and talks about not only Superman but the third Batman movie.
Some choice tidbits:
- The Superman movie and Batman movie will not be linked in any way. "They have nothing to do with each other," Nolan says. (But where does that leave the Justice League movie?)
- The idea for the movie occurred when David Goyer and Nolan were at an impasse on the third Batman and Goyer ran his Superman idea by Nolan.
- The third Batman is the final chapter in the story that Nolan is telling. "The key thing that makes the third film a great possibility for us is that we want to finish our story,” he says. “And in viewing it as the finishing of a story rather than infinitely blowing up the balloon and expanding the story.”
- Nolan stays mum on villains, but says, "It won't be Mr. Freeze."
- The best line in the piece, by the way, came when when the intrepid reporter tried to find out who the Superman villains would be, to which Nolan responds, "That’s a very sly way of asking a question I’m not going to answer."
-Thoughts?
Well, yes, according to reports, though he's only "god-fathering" the Man of Steel flick. Nikki Finke and Mike Fleming have a story about this here, but this is a taste:
I like this one a bit more than the last one, especially since it seems to highlight the ensemble cast...thoughts?
Thoughts? (Yes, it's obviously working off of the format for 'The Dark Knight', but it's a winning formula, so why not?)
In the news:
The Hollywood Reporter has the story on the cast that just keeps getting better:
...making it officially the most exciting project around...to me at least. Take a gander at this from The Hollywood Reporter:
Variety has the scoop: